Admission | Apply Online | Fee Payment | Document Verification | Mandatory Disclosures | About Us | Contact Us
Admission | Apply Online | Fee Payment | Document Verification | Mandatory Disclosures | About Us | Contact Us
IMLP is a students’ learning forum that supplements the classroom process by intellectually challenging and engaging the students on many dimensions of experiential learning. The platform for IMLP is the stage on which we give slots for different teams within which they need to showcase their presentation skills for the co-curricular task assigned to them.
Through this process, students improve and hone their communication skills while learning to give and take as team members to ensure that a mature performance is delivered. Students realize that team effort plays a critical part in delivering the topic for the day in front of a panel of expert judges who give constructive feedback to the students on stage. A panel of faculty and student judges is also enlisted to give useful feedback to students thereby fostering their critical thinking and emotional skills.
The experiential assignments keep varying from term to term but the fundamental proposition is to discover each student’s true potential and to rise to the occasion. With access to faculty members and mentors for consultation, we empower students to deliver different themes in a creative style with the messages clearly resonating to the student audience as learning for the day. Contemporary themes are presented that link educational content learned in the classroom to the practical knowledge.
Formats for presentation range from role plays of corporate boardroom discussions to the format of a big fight debate to interactive audience involvement sessions with quizzes of newspaper editorials on key issues. With every passing year, the students have invented new formats like the musical narrative format akin to the folklore traditions of yesteryear.
IMLP for the academic year 2020-2021 was conducted online due to the COVID-19 situation, except for 3 rounds in March. Google Meet and Zoom platform was used for the smooth conducting of the program.
Every round is initially brainstormed by the student coordinators and an outline is formed, which is then discussed with the faculty coordinators. After a few meetings and discussions, the round is decided upon. Once the round is fixed, the student coordinators frame the rules and regulations for the round and the same is communicated to the faculty coordinator. Once the rules and regulations are approved, it is communicated through an official mail to the students and faculty members.
According to the round, the rules and regulations are briefed to mentor group leaders by the student coordinators. Teams for every week are picked on a random basis by picking lots on camera with the mentor group leaders.
On the day of the round being conducted, the student coordinators assign roles among themselves such as being the host, timer, keeping a check on the score etc. The round being by the coordinators giving a brief idea about the round and the rules.
The teams are judged by the faculty members on the basis of evaluation criteria and individual feedback on how to improve is given to the students.
While IMLP was conducted on campus, student judges were also involved, to foster critical thinking and communication skills.
IMLP has had a huge impact on the students in being able to boost confidence in presenting in front of a crowd and enabling students to improve themselves.
IMLP has had a huge impact on the students in being able to boost confidence in presenting in front of a crowd and enabling students to improve themselves.
A detailed overview about IMLP was given to the students of PGDM Batch 29 on 13/08/2020.
This academic year, the format of the IMLP program was thoroughly revised in order to achieve the following objectives:
Students were asked to make a video with the following contents: Name chosen for the Mentor group, Logo, tagline, Introduction of members of the group, each member’s innate strengths and how they plan to contribute to the group. The videos were uploaded on a YouTube site and played in google meet where the judges gave their comments and suggestions for improvement
The criteria for evaluation were the logic and creativity in choice of the name, logo, and tagline. Clarity of expression, voice modulation, grooming, adhering to timelines were also being considered while evaluating and giving comments. To motivate students a social media post was put up with the winners of the round.
Mentor Groups were required to make a presentation through google meet. Topics given for presentation were relevant business-related ones, for example - Covid19 induced changes in business practices, Corporate Social responsibility, and Leadership lessons from Women Mangers etc.
The criteria for evaluation were content (research based), presentation style, clarity in communication, voice modulation, adherence to timing, and grooming.
Mentor groups were split into two groups and each sub-group had to debate on a given topic with another mentor sub-group. The round was conducted through google meet. The aim was to develop quick thinking and spontaneous speaking skills among students. It was also to ensure that students don’t read from the screen and speak up.
The main criterion for evaluation was the substance/content of the argument (research-based arguments put forward by the teams supported by facts and figures from authentic sources). The structure and clarity (of argument), cross-examination and rebuttal, grooming, adherence to time etc. were also considered for marking.
Publishing of results in a timely manner was ensured for all the rounds. Students’ feedback was also taken for the rounds and changes were incorporated accordingly
Each mentor group was divided into two sub-groups. A total of 34 teams contested in this round. Two sub groups (from different mentor groups) were given an opportunity to present their perspective on the randomly selected case study. Teams had to analyse the case study and find solutions to the problems.
The evaluation criteria were Problem Identification, Depth of Analysis with theoretical linkage, Solution suggested /feasibility of solution, presentation Style, adherence to time/Grooming. Each team member had a time limit of 2 mins.
Two mentor groups were given one sector (e-commerce, education, health, tourism etc.) and asked to present their individual Business plans pertaining to that sector.
The evaluation criteria were Opportunity Identification, Marketing Plan, Operational & legal feasibility, Financial Feasibility and quality of presentation. The comments given by the judges and mentors helped the students improve their holistic view of Business.
The quiz consisted of 3 rounds in total. The first round, general quiz, with 10 questions for each team and 10 seconds given to answer a question. The second round, picture round, with 10 questions for each team and 10 seconds given to answer a question. The third round, Rapid Fire, 10 questions and 7 seconds to answer a question. All the team members will have to be on camera throughout the quiz. Once a member answers, they’ll not be allowed to do it again. This is to ensure active participation.
| SL. No | NAME | FK ID |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arun Nandakumar | FK-3484 |
| 2 | Minu Salila | FK-3556 |
| 3 | Ajith Janardhanan | FK-3480 |
| 4 | Ashima Sivan | FK-3528 |
| 5 | Alex Varghese | FK-3542 |
| 6 | Shivani R Menon | FK-3522 |
| 7 | Anette Josetta Sequeira | FK-3460 |
| 8 | Ansa Joseph | FK-3545 |
| 9 | Selvin Sebastian | FK-3598 |
Each mentor group was expected to make a video after a discussion with their respective mentors.
Mentor – Mr. Sudheer Sudhakaran
Mentor –Ms. Anjali A
Mentor – Dr. K Balasubramanian
Mentor – Ms. Divya M.O.
Mentor – Ms. Manju Meenakshy
Mentor – Dr. Sheena K
Mentor – Mr. Praveen Madhavan
Mentor – Mr. Pradeep K.V
Mentor – Dr. Joby Joy
Mentor – Dr. Meera M.S.
Mentor – Ms. Priya S
Mentor – Ms. Jisha J
Mentor – Ms. Priya Jagadeesh
Mentor – Prof. Cherian Varghese
Mentor – Dr. Simmy Kurian
Mentor – Prof. Cherian Peter
Mentor – Dr. Lishin M Joshy
The top five teams on the basis of scores given by the judges as per the criteria mentioned.
The top teams were appreciated through social media posts to encourage participants to put in their best
Teams will be presenting each week on a topic related to a given theme. This round will be online live through google meet.
The top performers of Round II on the basis marks scored. One top performer was selected from each topic.
| SL. No | Team Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | Team Synergists |
| 2 | Team Gryffindor |
| 3 | Team Dice |
| 4 | Team Trojan Horses |
This round aimed to develop critical thinking and public speaking skills among students. This round was conducted online live through google meet.
Judges - Dr. Lishin M Joshy, Ms. Anjali A
| TEAM AFFIRMATIVE | TEAM NEGATIVE | TOPIC |
|---|---|---|
| ENDEAVOUR(A) | PRAGYA(B) | Controversy as a marketing strategy - Does it work? |
| ENDEAVOUR(B) | SYNERGISTS(B) | Banning Chinese products, a Viable option? |
| IGNITORS(A) | MAVERICKS(A) | Corporate Social Responsibility - Is it a genuine effort? |
| ESPERER(A) | PRAGYA(A) | Is technology rising unemployment rates? |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| PRAGYA(A) | A+ |
| ENDEAVOUR(B) | A |
| SYNERGISTS(B) | A |
| IGNITORS(A) | A |
| ESPERER(A) | A |
Judge - Ms. Divya M.O.
| TEAM AFFIRMATIVE | TEAM NEGATIVE | TOPIC |
|---|---|---|
| GRYFFINDORS(A)/td> | MAVENS(B) | Consumer Satisfaction should be achieved at any cost |
| TROJAN HORSES(B) | SASHAKTH(B) | Media freedom - there should be a limit |
| INVICTUS(A) | SYNERGISTS(A) | CRM software’s result in loss of customer privacy |
| MAVERICKS(B) | FORTUNE 700(A) | Nepotism in the workplace is acceptable |
| DICE(A) | GOLDEN HAWKS(A) | Open book exams are better than closed book exams |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| Trojan Horses (B) | A |
| ENDEAVOUR(B) | A |
| Sashakth (B) | A |
Judges - Prof. Cherian Peter, Dr. Bijith George Abraham
| TEAM AFFIRMATIVE | TEAM NEGATIVE | TOPIC |
|---|---|---|
| ARCOBALENO(B) | FORTUNE 700(B) | E-learning is better than regular classroom learning |
| BEAVERS(B) | RESURRECTORS(B) | Inheritors make better CEOs than professional executives |
| GOLDEN HAWKS(B) | MAVENS(A) | A Republican President (USA) is a better choice for India |
| BEAVERS(A) | SASHAKTH(A) | Employees who work from home are more productive. |
None of the teams scored A/A+.
Judges – Dr. Sheena K, Ms. Priya S
| TEAM AFFIRMATIVE | TEAM NEGATIVE | TOPIC |
|---|---|---|
| DICE(B) | GRYFFINDORS(B) | Neuralink Technology will pose a significant threat to the future of Human race |
| INVICTUS(B) | ESPERER(B) | Privatization of railways (in India) is a good move |
| RESURRECTORS(A) | IGNITORS(B) | India is ready for a Cashless Economy (cashless transactions) |
| ARCOBALENO(A) | TROJAN HORSES(A) | Social Media is negatively affecting the mental health of the youth |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| Trojan Horses (B) | A |
| Sashakth (B) | A |
In this round, the aim was to find solutions to the case studies with the use of lessons learnt in the class. Students had to analyze various problems related to Human Resource, Finance, Operations and Marketing.
Judges – Mr. Praveen Madhavan, Prof. Cherian Varghese
| First Team | Second Team | Case Study |
|---|---|---|
| FORTUNE 700 (B) | SASHAKTH (B) | 1 |
| BEAVERS (B) | ARCABALENO (B) | 2 |
| ARCABALENO (A) | SYNERGIST (A) | 5 |
| INVICTUS (B) | MAVENS (A) | 3 |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| FORTUNE 700(B) | A+ |
| SASHAKTH(B) | A |
| SYNERGIST(A) | A |
| BEAVERS(B) | A |
Judges – Mr. Sudheer Sudhakaran, Ms. Jisha J
| First Team | Second Team | Case Study |
|---|---|---|
| MAVENS(B) | SYNERGISTS(B) | 3 |
| DICE(B) | TROJAN HORSES(B) | 5 |
| IGNITORS(A) | TROJAN HORSES(A) | 4 |
| ESPERORS(A) | GOLDEN HAWKS(B) | 1 |
None of the teams scored A/A+
Judges – Dr. Lishin M Joshy, Dr. Meera M.S
| First Team | Second Team | Case Study |
|---|---|---|
| GRYFFINDOR (A) | ENDEAVOUR (A) | 3 |
| ENDEAVOUR (B) | RESURRECTORS (B) | 2 |
| PRAGYA (B) | GRYFFINDORS (B) | 4 |
| RESURRECTORS (A) | IGNITORS (B) | 5 |
| MAVERICKS (B) | FORTUNE 700 (A) | 1 |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| ENDEAVOUR (B) | A |
| PRAGYA (B) | A |
JJudges – Prof. Cherian Peter, Ms. Divya M.O.
| First Team | Second Team | Case Study |
|---|---|---|
| ESPERER(B) | PRAGYA(A) | 1 |
| MAVERICKS(A) | INVICTUS(A) | 5 |
| GOLDEN HAWKS(A) | DICE(A) | 2 |
| SASHAKTH(A) | BEAVERS(A) | 4 |
| Team | Grade |
|---|---|
| INVICTUS (A) | A |
The main aim of conducting this round was to create an entrepreneurial mind set in the students. Mentor groups were asked to present business idea based on particular industry allotted to them per week.
As the Institution reopened, IMLP was conducted offline on campus. It was organized in the seminar hall every Thursday.
Due to shift to online classes, IMLP was shifted back to the online platform.
This round was conducted with the purpose of creating awareness about contemporary business developments.
Conducted on 20/5/21, 27/5/21 and 3/6/21.
20/5/21 Winners
27/5/21 Winners
3/6/21
As a part of IMLP, six different activities have been conducted. They are; Team launch, Online live presentation, Debate, Case Study Analysis, Business Plan Presentation and Quiz.
IMLP has helped students gain confidence and improve their communication skills as well. With online presentations, students have been keen on finding innovative ways to bring in the fun element.
